Personal Feed Filtering with Jev
这是 Ackerman 公开的项目资料。本站按原始来源展示项目信息，用中文说明适用场景和阅读边界；项目名、源帖与代码保持原样，便于逐项核对。
这条案例记录了什么
Agent 评估
为已记录的输出或轨迹提供分类、分数或复核信号。
社区公开项目或作者演示
原始来源：X post。作者自述，本站未独立复现。
Ackerman
记录日期：2026-09-24。日期与身份应以原始资料为准。
原始演示视频
视频来自此案例记录的原始媒体；播放内容和作者声明不等于本站复现。
怎样核对这个项目
- 先打开原始来源，确认作者、日期与 Jev 在项目中的具体用途。
- 如果提供仓库，再检查代码、运行要求和许可证；仓库存在不代表本站已经运行成功。
- 对速度、成本、准确率和规模数字，查看原文的任务、环境和计算口径。
- 是否有可观察的正确答案。
- 评估输入是否完整。
- 分数与人工复核的一致性。
原始文字与技术细节
以下内容保留原语言，供核对事实。中文页的场景说明是阅读提示，不是逐句翻译或实测结论。
展开英文项目摘要与原帖
项目摘要
Ackerman demonstrates a personal feed filter using Jev to evaluate relevance, value, format and unsupported claims. The author reports narrowing 1,000 posts to 20. The reported 97 ms per post and 1.2 cents for a morning are author claims, not measurements reproduced by this site.
来源原文
98% of my feed is junk. Now I don’t even see it I built a filter that reads my feed for me. It runs on Jev - a model that doesn’t generate text; it just makes binary decisions, in milliseconds and for pennies. For every post, it evaluates four questions: Is it relevant to my niche? Does it provide real value? What format is it (breakdown, news, ad, meme)? And does it make loud claims with zero proof? Out of 1,000 posts, only 20 remained. 97 milliseconds per post. 1.2 cents for the entire morning. The most frustrating takeaway, nearly half of my feed was ads and memes, not the creators I originally followed for substance. An hour of mindless scrolling turned into five lines over breakfast.
原记录的限制
- Reported counts, speed and cost have not been independently reproduced.
- The author’s preferences are not a universal definition of useful content; relevant posts may be excluded.